Meta Snapshot #13
Update: 26 January 2020; First published: 24 December 2019; Game version: 126.96.36.199
- 26 January 2020:
- Added: Pincer Maneuver Siege Draug, Tactical Decision Masquerade Ball
- Removed (due to meta irrelevance): Radeyah Pincer Maneuver, Tactical Decision Shupe
- Updated: Call of Harmony Radeyah Elves, Precision Strike Elves
- 18 January 2020:
- Added: Blood Scent Vampires, Fruits of Ysgith Haunt, Pincer Maneuver Radeyah Draug, Radeyah Wild Card and Tactical Decision Shupe
- Updated: Gedyneith Second Wind, Kikimore Queen Death's Shadow, Mystic Echo Harmony, Siege Mobilization, Siege Pincer Maneuver, Wild Card Passiflora
- Tier adjustments:
- Call of Harmony Radeyah Elves Tier 1 ⇒ Tier 2
- Lockdown Radeyah Tier 2 ⇒ Tier 3
- Strategic Withdrawal Aristocrats Tier 3 ⇒ HM
- Wild Card Midrange Tier 2 ⇒ Tier 3
- Wild Card Passiflora Tier 3 ⇒ Tier 2
- 30 December 2019:
- Added: Call of Harmoney Radeyah Elves, Carapace Keltullis, Death's Shadow Ruehin, Imperial Formation No Units, Lockdown Radeyah, Poison Spies, Wild Card Passiflora
- Updated: Kikimore Queen Death's Shadow
- Tier adjustments:
- Kikimore Queen Death's Shadow Honorouble Mentions ⇒ Tier 3
Consultants: Adzikov, Damorquis, Jamedi, JMJWilson23, Kochua, Kolemoen, Molegion, Santtu2x, Sergi2Vamos.
Editors: Apero, Kochua
Decks in this tier have favourable matchups against the majority of lower tier decks and some favourable matchups against other Tier 1 lists. Another criterion is that these decks should be able to win against lower-tier decks on blue coin most of the time.
Decks in this tier can beat Tier 1 decks if the player can access its full potential, or are strong decks with a clear counter; in addition, these decks should win consistently against lower tiers.
While decks in this tier remain good laddering options that can successfully achieve high winrates, they can struggle to achieve the same winrate when matched up against decks we place in higher tiers. They may make for strong tournament options.
Decks here aren't strong or popular enough to be tiered, but have enough potential to be better with the adequate support cards. They may win against unsuspecting opponents and can make for interesting tournament options, but are otherwise worth just keeping an eye on.
Written by Jamedi; Consultation: Damorquis, JMJWilson23 and SwanDive
What is a Meta Snapshot?
A Meta Snapshot is a comprehensive list of the decks which are played in a CCG. The decks are ordered by criteria, accounting for their power level through a tier (used by Team Aretuza & Team Nova), star or numerical system. If you would like to discuss our current Meta Snapshot, you can join our Discord server.
Which kind of criteria are used to classify a deck into a tier?
While the list of criteria is extensive, here are the most important aspects:
- Power level is the amount of points a deck can output in comparison to others in the meta. In general, decks of higher tiers tend to have a greater number of unconditional points without depending on what rival decks do.
- Consistency is focused on the draw dependency of a deck and the amount of thinning this deck has. Better thinning means more consistency, which usually means easier access to higher-value cards. If a deck is too dependent on drawing one or two certain cards but runs no thinning, it lacks consistency.
- Counterability is the difficulty that other decks have to tech for the matchup against a certain deck and how much they need to sacrifice to improve the matchup. In Gwent, there are a lot of ways to prepare a deck for a concrete matchup and we can expect players to tech against the strongest/most popular decks of the metagame. The capability of a deck to win despite teching plays a role in its tier placement.
The data are collected by the players in several hundred matches and is then translated into the Snapshot. While the normal ladder experience can be different, tiered decks are good to climb the ladder to Pro Rank with relative ease.
What is the meaning of the different tiers?
- Tier 1: Decks in this tier are the strongest, the most difficult to counter and heavily influence how decks in other tiers adapt.
- Tier 2: Usually this tier covers decks which are still good, but due to some reason, they cannot be qualified as Tier 1. They usually have less strength than Tier 1 decks or have another factor that makes them slightly worse than top tier decks. In some particular metagames, a deck can be Tier 2 due to how easy it is to tech against it.
- Tier 3: Decks in this category are still viable for climbing the ranked ladder, but they encounter more difficulty at high fMMR. They can still be used as tournament picks (in formats in which you can ban). They may still have favorable matchups versus some Tier 1 decks, but they are usually unfavored. Decks which are inconsistent or too draw-dependent also fall into this category.
- Honorable Mentions: Here, we put decks whose strength is not enough to be tiered, but which have the potential to be much better with some support. These decks are always worth keeping an eye on. A deck which has been discovered recently and has not been played enough to be tiered can also fall into this category.
My experience differs from what you describe in the Snapshot. Does this mean that the Snapshot is not accurate?
Short answer, no. Long answer, there are a huge number of factors that can influence the development of a matchup between two players with their respective decks, which includes player skill, knowledge of the matchup and the respective decks, cards drawn and how they have played the match. Also, it is worth noting that a meta snapshot represents a picture of how the meta is in a particular moment. “Tiers” as defined above are never rigid constructs. In any given day, the meta can shift dramatically.
In general, inexperienced players tend to play worse and with more unpredictable lists. As we move up on the ladder, decklists tend to be more optimized, sometimes influenced by content creators such as popular streamers or the most recent meta snapshot. Reaching Pro Rank, we can expect to face the best possible players with the most optimized decklists.
I have a different list from the one shown in the Snapshot. Does this mean that one of the lists is incorrect?
Lists provided in our snapshots are usually stock lists, which are supposed to be a base to be modified according to the meta you are currently facing and your own playstyle. The tech section provides some card replacement options which may be more effective within a particular meta. This normally does not affect a deck’s overall consistency.
I haven’t seen this deck which appears in the Snapshot / I play this list or this archetype and it isn’t in the Snapshot.
The Snapshot tries to be as accurate and complete as possible. We release an initial snapshot as soon as the meta has settled after a game patch and make as many updates as possible afterwards. If a deck is not included, it will most likely be added in one of the next updates, as we try to prioritize the most popular and relevant decks. Despite that, we have to skip some decks which are unpopular or are very similar to existing ones. If you would like to be informed about our updates, feel free to check our website regularly or follow Team Aretuza or Team Nova on Twitter or Discord.
Are you just including the most popular decks/FOTM lists? Do you keep the best lists for yourselves?
No. While it is true that part of our work is to try and create a representation of the meta that is as accurate as possible and this, of course, includes the popularity of decks, popularity has no impact on how decks are tiered. We do not keep the best lists for ourselves. We are creating meta snapshots to share our collective knowledge of this game and provide players of all levels with a more enjoyable Gwent experience.
Do you have more questions? Join the discussion on Discord!
Passiflora is one of the more greedy options in Syndicate, as we can generate a huge number of Coins but also run the risk of being disrupted by either artifact removal or a lack of Coin spenders (through bad draws or opposing removal). Additionally, we can make room for many high-impact cards by reducing the number of tutors we utilize. Thus, we sacrifice a degree of flexibility and consistency to squeeze as many points out of the list as possible. Our objective is to present a large number of threats to the opponent and force them to have enough answers to shut us down, although we will still sometimes fall short with our strong engines if we cannot extract enough value out of efficient cards like Graden or if we miss key pieces.
- While Passiflora is more difficult to use than other Scenarios, it provides enough power to be able to compete in any round length. Not being able to proc more than one Chapter per turn is problematic, but we can just play our Defender (by means of Azar Javed) to keep it safe.
- Our list generates a massive number of Coins and one of the real payoff cards is Saul de Navarette. It is an engine that grows on its own effectively, which quickly takes it out of removal range. Over the course of a long round, it can present another huge threat in a similar way to Dire Mutated Hound.
- More power in form of Coins than other Syndicate lists
- Better against swarm decks
- Not able to proc multiple chapters of Passiflora in the same turn
- Tight balance of Coin providers and spenders
- Adalbertus Kalkstein ⇒ Tavern Brawl
- Maraal ⇒ The Flying Redanian
Tavern Brawl can have a large payoff, but it overlaps with our large amount of removal cards. Adalbertus Kalkstein allows us to stay in a round when we are targeted with certain statuses (mainly Poison). However, we can gain some surprise value out of Tavern Brawl by putting it into the list or we may want to play it in a certain meta where decks that are somewhat limited in their positioning (Mystic Echo Harmony is a good example) are prevalent.
Maraal is one of the more powerful cards available when Poisons are a consideration, so it is a natural inclusion in the deck. One option we can use instead is The Flying Redanian, which can be awkward at times but has synergy with some cards in our deck (such as Saul de Navarette). It can also provide us with extra points in multiple rounds and increases our thinning.
Written by Jamedi and JMJWilson23.
8,010 25 17 165
48Dire Mutated Hound
47Saul de Navarette
4Fisstechx2Profit 4. Poison a unit.
4Slanderx2Profit 3. Place a Bounty on an enemy unit.
44Sea Jackalx2Fee 2: Boost self by 2. Hoard 7: Boost self by 3 instead.
34Mutated Houndsx2Deploy (Melee): Give an enemy unit Bleeding for 2 turns. Deploy (Ranged): Poison a unit.
24Street Urchinsx2Profit: 3. Fee 1: Boost self by 1.