Snapshot Header Image

The Team Aretuza GWENT Meta Snapshot attempts to showcase the most-played decks on the Pro and Ranked ladders. We then attempt to rank them based on deck strength. These are the decks dominating the ladder right now, and this list does not represent all of the decks available nor even necessarily the best there is to be seen.

Every deck has a short guide explaining how the list works, its pros and cons, and a few other considerations to take into account. We also list a few matchups we think are particularly good or bad for each deck. 

As the meta continues to shift, we will update our Snapshot to reflect the changes. Updates will continue to be announced on the Team Aretuza Discord Community and official Team Aretuza Twitter account.

Meta Snapshot #14

Patch Overview

PLEASE NOTE: This Meta Snapshot was intended for use during the Season of Love (February of 2020) and does not accurately reflect the meta as of the Season of the Bear (March 2020)

Below is Team Aretuza and Team Nova's Meta Snapshot for the Season of Love. The meta displays a large degree of variability after the balance patch that was implemented before this season's start. No true contenders stand out as one to completely dominate the meta as of yet, so we will remain diligent in following the meta to see if this changes. As always, we will make appropriate changes throughout the season to keep viewers up to date with the meta to the best of our ability. You can follow the invite link to our Discord server in the upper right hand corner of the site to ask any questions you may have at any time. Enjoy and good luck on your Gwent journey this month!

Changelog:

Contributors

Consultants: Adzikov, Damorquis, Jamedi, JMJWilson23, Kochua, Kolemoen, Molegion, Santtu2x, Sergi2Vamos.
Editors: Apero, Kochua
Manager: JMJWilson23

Tier 1

Decks in this tier have favourable matchups against the majority of lower tier decks and some favourable matchups against other Tier 1 lists. Another criterion is that these decks should be able to win against lower-tier decks on blue coin most of the time.

 

Tier 2

Decks in this tier can beat Tier 1 decks if the player can access its full potential, or are strong decks with a clear counter; in addition, these decks should win consistently against lower tiers.

 

Tier 3

While decks in this tier remain good laddering options that can successfully achieve high winrates, they can struggle to achieve the same winrate when matched up against decks we place in higher tiers. They may make for strong tournament options.

 

Honorable Mentions

Decks here aren't strong or popular enough to be tiered, but have enough potential to be better with the adequate support cards. They may win against unsuspecting opponents and can make for interesting tournament options, but are otherwise worth just keeping an eye on.


Written by Jamedi; Consultation: Damorquis, JMJWilson23 and SwanDive

 

What is a Meta Snapshot?

A Meta Snapshot is a comprehensive list of the decks which are played in a CCG. The decks are ordered by criteria, accounting for their power level through a tier (used by Team Aretuza & Team Nova), star or numerical system. If you would like to discuss our current Meta Snapshot, you can join our Discord server.

 

Which kind of criteria are used to classify a deck into a tier?

While the list of criteria is extensive, here are the most important aspects:

  • Power level is the amount of points a deck can output in comparison to others in the meta. In general, decks of higher tiers tend to have a greater number of unconditional points without depending on what rival decks do.
  • Consistency is focused on the draw dependency of a deck and the amount of thinning this deck has. Better thinning means more consistency, which usually means easier access to higher-value cards. If a deck is too dependent on drawing one or two certain cards but runs no thinning, it lacks consistency.
  • Counterability is the difficulty that other decks have to tech for the matchup against a certain deck and how much they need to sacrifice to improve the matchup. In Gwent, there are a lot of ways to prepare a deck for a concrete matchup and we can expect players to tech against the strongest/most popular decks of the metagame. The capability of a deck to win despite teching plays a role in its tier placement.

The data are collected by the players in several hundred matches and is then translated into the Snapshot. While the normal ladder experience can be different, tiered decks are good to climb the ladder to Pro Rank with relative ease.

 

What is the meaning of the different tiers?
  • Tier 1: Decks in this tier are the strongest, the most difficult to counter and heavily influence how decks in other tiers adapt.
  • Tier 2: Usually this tier covers decks which are still good, but due to some reason, they cannot be qualified as Tier 1. They usually have less strength than Tier 1 decks or have another factor that makes them slightly worse than top tier decks. In some particular metagames, a deck can be Tier 2 due to how easy it is to tech against it.
  • Tier 3: Decks in this category are still viable for climbing the ranked ladder, but they encounter more difficulty at high fMMR. They can still be used as tournament picks (in formats in which you can ban). They may still have favorable matchups versus some Tier 1 decks, but they are usually unfavored. Decks which are inconsistent or too draw-dependent also fall into this category.
  • Honorable Mentions: Here, we put decks whose strength is not enough to be tiered, but which have the potential to be much better with some support. These decks are always worth keeping an eye on. A deck which has been discovered recently and has not been played enough to be tiered can also fall into this category.

 

My experience differs from what you describe in the Snapshot. Does this mean that the Snapshot is not accurate?

Short answer, no. Long answer, there are a huge number of factors that can influence the development of a matchup between two players with their respective decks, which includes player skill, knowledge of the matchup and the respective decks, cards drawn and how they have played the match. Also, it is worth noting that a meta snapshot represents a picture of how the meta is in a particular moment. “Tiers” as defined above are never rigid constructs. In any given day, the meta can shift dramatically.

In general, inexperienced players tend to play worse and with more unpredictable lists. As we move up on the ladder, decklists tend to be more optimized, sometimes influenced by content creators such as popular streamers or the most recent meta snapshot. Reaching Pro Rank, we can expect to face the best possible players with the most optimized decklists.

 

I have a different list from the one shown in the Snapshot. Does this mean that one of the lists is incorrect?

Lists provided in our snapshots are usually stock lists, which are supposed to be a base to be modified according to the meta you are currently facing and your own playstyle. The tech section provides some card replacement options which may be more effective within a particular meta. This normally does not affect a deck’s overall consistency.

 

I haven’t seen this deck which appears in the Snapshot / I play this list or this archetype and it isn’t in the Snapshot.

The Snapshot tries to be as accurate and complete as possible. We release an initial snapshot as soon as the meta has settled after a game patch and make as many updates as possible afterwards. If a deck is not included, it will most likely be added in one of the next updates, as we try to prioritize the most popular and relevant decks. Despite that, we have to skip some decks which are unpopular or are very similar to existing ones. If you would like to be informed about our updates, feel free to check our website regularly or follow Team Aretuza or Team Nova on Twitter or Discord.

 

Are you just including the most popular decks/FOTM lists? Do you keep the best lists for yourselves?

No. While it is true that part of our work is to try and create a representation of the meta that is as accurate as possible and this, of course, includes the popularity of decks, popularity has no impact on how decks are tiered. We do not keep the best lists for ourselves. We are creating meta snapshots to share our collective knowledge of this game and provide players of all levels with a more enjoyable Gwent experience.

 

Do you have more questions? Join the discussion on Discord!


Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

Overview

Masquerade Ball is an exceptionally powerful card when it is not removed, enough so that we form an entire deck centered around the card. We play a deck with double copies of our bronzes (thus playing without Radeyah) in order to amplify the effect of our various synergies and improve our chances of playing Masquerade Ball twice in a game through the use of Assire var Anahid. Our deck is strong in any round length, making it flexible to deal with any given situation. Our ability to replay Masquerade Ball if we do not fear artifact removal means that we can potentially commit it in Round 1 if winning Round 1 is important for the given matchup. In general, playing some golds in Round 1 is acceptable to win it because we want to play reactively in Round 3 many times and we also are able to recycle a gold back into our deck with Assire anyway. After the new patch, this deck seems to be much weaker than the rest of the field, but it remains a potentially viable option for Nilfgaard.

Essential Cards

  • Masquerade Ball is the heart and soul of the deck, providing us with a large portion of our power. We can sometimes complete the whole Scenario or at least one Chapter with our leader ability to play around artifact removal to a degree. Make sure to hold enough Aristocrats to make Masquerade Ball work, even if you have to keep multiple bronzes in hand to do so.
  • The Tactical Decision leader ability is a bit weak on its own (due to the nature of mulligans) so we need a way to strengthen it. Yennefer's Invocation is a core card in many Nilfgaard decks, but none more than this one. We are able to put a strong opponent's card on top of our deck and replay it through our leader ability or with Joachim de Wett. Invocation is especially necessary in matches against other Nilfgaard decks, as we need to be prepared with an answer to an opposing Masquerade Ball.

Pros

  • Completely wipes out decks that utilize tall units in their gameplan
  • The large power spike provided by Masquerade Ball can quickly swing a large number of points in our favor.

Cons

  • Reliant on going second in many matchups
  • Some weakness to artifact removal, as the last Chapter is equally strong compared to the first

Tech Choices

  • Artorius Vigo, Tourney Joust ⇒ Cantarella, Courier

The possibility of getting a lowroll with Artorius Vigo is annoying sometimes, mainly due to the fact we are running 6 different units (making this card an effective 50%). The options are a bit redundant among themselves, making the worst cases of Vigo slightly better. We propose potentially using Cantarella, which can steal important cards from our opponent or act as a way to protect ourselves against Yennefer's Invocation in the Nilfgaard mirror match.

Written by Jamedi

7,490 26 21 167

  • 17
    Tactical Decision
    Leader
    Tactical Decision Order: Look at the top 3 cards from your deck and play one. This ability adds 17 provisions to your deck's provisions limit.
  • 0
    Collar
    Collar Order: Lock an enemy unit and damage it by 3.
  • 14
    Masquerade Ball
    Masquerade Ball Scenario: Progress whenever you play an Aristocrat. Prologue: Spawn a Thirsty Dame in this row. Chapter 1: Spawn and play Fangs of the Empire. Chapter 2: Spawn and play Fangs of the Empire.
  • 5
    11
    Vincent Van Moorlehem
    Vincent Van Moorlehem Deploy: Destroy an enemy unit with status.
  • 5
    10
    Maraal
    Maraal Deploy: Poison an enemy unit. Order: Poison an enemy unit.
  • 4
    10
    Joachim de Wett
    Joachim de Wett Spying. Deploy: Play the top non-Spying unit from your deck, then boost it by 8.
  • 9
    Yennefer's Invocation
    Yennefer's Invocation Place an enemy unit or an enemy artifact on the top of your deck.
  • 6
    9
    Matta Hu'uri
    Matta Hu'uri Deploy (Ranged): If neither player has passed and your opponent's hand is not full, they draw the lowest-cost card, and you draw the highest-cost card.
  • 8
    Bribery
    Bribery Create and play a unit from your opponent's starting deck.
  • 6
    8
    Assire var Anahid
    Assire var Anahid Deploy (Melee): Shuffle a card from the opponent's graveyard into their deck. Deploy (Ranged): Shuffle a card from your graveyard into your deck.
  • 2
    8
    Artorius Vigo
    Artorius Vigo Assimilate. Deploy: Create and play a 1-power copy of a bronze unit from your starting deck.
  • 6
    7
    Cynthia
    Cynthia Deploy (Melee): Spawn The Guardian and place it at the top of your opponent's deck.
  • 5
    7
    Van Moorlehem's Cupbearer
    Van Moorlehem's Cupbearer Assimilate Deploy (Melee): Poison a unit. Deploy (Ranged): Purify a unit.
  • 2
    6
    Roderick of Dun Tynne
    Roderick of Dun Tynne Spying. Deploy: Look at 2 random gold cards from your deck, then play 1.
  • 5
    5
    Rot Tosser
    x2
    Rot Tosser Deploy (Ranged): Spawn and play a Cow Carcass.
  • 4
    5
    Thirsty Dame
    x2
    Thirsty Dame Whenever an enemy unit receives a status, boost self by 1.
  • 3
    5
    King Cobra
    x2
    King Cobra Deploy: Poison an enemy unit.
  • 1
    5
    Duchess's Informant
    x2
    Duchess's Informant Spying. Deploy: Spawn and play a base copy of a non-Spying bronze enemy unit.
  • 4
    Tourney Joust
    Tourney Joust Remove an enemy unit's Shield and damage it by 4, or give an allied unit a Shield and boost it by 4.
  • 4
    4
    Fangs of the Empire
    x2
    Fangs of the Empire Deploy: Give an enemy unit Poison.
  • 3
    4
    Van Moorlehem Hunter
    x2
    Van Moorlehem Hunter Deploy (Melee) Give an enemy unit Bleeding for 2 turns. Deploy (Ranged): Lock a unit.

Matchups

Struggles against

Honorable Mentions